Postoperative imaging of orthopaedic hardware in the hand and wrist: is there an added value for tomosynthesis?

Published:September 11, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.08.001

      Highlights

      • Digital tomosynthesis provides higher interobserver agreement.
      • Digital tomosynthesis provides better delineation of fracture margins.
      • Better visibility of fracture healing is indicated by digital tomosynthesis.

      Aim

      To prospectively investigate digital tomosynthesis (DTS) as an alternative to digital radiography (DR) for postoperative imaging of orthopaedic hardware after trauma or arthrodesis in the hand and wrist.

      Materials and methods

      Thirty-six consecutive patients (12 female, median age 36 years, range 19–86 years) were included in this institutional review board approved clinical trial. Imaging was performed with DTS in dorso-palmar projection and DR was performed in dorso-palmar, lateral, and oblique views. Images were evaluated by two independent radiologists for qualitative and diagnosis-related imaging parameters using a four-point Likert scale (1=excellent, 4 not diagnostic) and nominal scale. Interobserver agreement between the two readers was assessed with Cohen's kappa (k). Differences between DTS and CR were tested with Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

      Results

      Regarding image quality, interobserver agreement was higher for DTS compared to DR, especially for fracture-related parameters (delineation osteosynthesis material [OSM]: K DTS 0.96 versus K DR 0.45; delineation fracture margins: K DTS 0.78 versus K DR 0.35). Delineation of fracture margins and delineation of adjacent joint spaces scored significant better for DTS compared to DR (delineation fracture margins: DTS 1.54, DR 2.28, p 0.001; delineation adjacent joint spaces: DTS 1.31, DR 2.24, p 0.001). Regarding diagnosis-related findings, interobserver agreement was almost equal. DTS showed a significant higher sharpness of fracture margins (DTS 1.94, DR 2.33, p 0.04). Mean dose area product (DAP) for DTS was significant higher compared to DR (mean DR 0.219 Gy·cm 2, mean DTS 0.903 Gy·cm 2, p 0.001).

      Conclusion

      Fracture healing is more visible and interobserver agreement is higher for DTS compared to DR in the postoperative assessment of orthopaedic hardware in the hand and wrist.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Clinical Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ottenin M.A.
        • Jacquot A.
        • Grospretre O.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis in fractures of the wrist.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: 180-186
        • Cheah A.E.
        • Yao J.
        Hand fractures: indications, the tried and true and new innovations.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41: 712-722
        • Corrales L.A.
        • Morshed S.
        • Bhandari M.
        • et al.
        Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 1862-1868
        • Bhandari M.
        • Chiavaras M.M.
        • Parasu N.
        • et al.
        Radiographic union score for hip substantially improves agreement between surgeons and radiologists.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 14: 70
        • Ha A.S.
        • Lee A.Y.
        • Hippe D.S.
        • et al.
        Digital tomosynthesis to evaluate fracture healing: prospective comparison with radiography and CT.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205: 136-141
        • Hooley R.J.
        • Durand M.A.
        • Philpotts L.E.
        Advances in digital breast tomosynthesis.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 208: 256-266
        • Geijer M.
        • Gunnlaugsson E.
        • Götestrand S.
        • et al.
        Tomosynthesis of the thoracic spine: added value in diagnosing vertebral fractures in the elderly.
        Eur Radiol. 2017; 27: 491-497
        • Canella C.
        • Philippe P.
        • Pansini V.
        • et al.
        Use of tomosynthesis for erosion evaluation in rheumatoid arthritic hands and wrists.
        Radiology. 2011; 258: 199-205
        • Aoki T.
        • Fujii M.
        • Yamashita Y.
        • et al.
        Tomosynthesis of the wrist and hand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with radiography and MRI.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202: 386-390
        • Geijer M.
        • Börjesson A.M.
        • Göthlin J.H.
        Clinical utility of tomosynthesis in suspected scaphoid fracture. A pilot study.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40: 863-867
        • Martini K.
        • Becker A.S.
        • Guggenberger R.
        • et al.
        Value of tomosynthesis for lesion evaluation of small joints in osteoarthritic hands using the OARSI score.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016; 24: 1167-1171
        • Machida H.
        • Yuhara T.
        • Mori T.
        • et al.
        Optimizing parameters for flat-panel detector digital tomosynthesis.
        RadioGraphics. 2010; 30: 549-562
        • Göthlin J.H.
        • Geijer M.
        The utility of digital linear tomosynthesis imaging of total hip joint arthroplasty with suspicion of loosening: a prospective study in 40 patients.
        Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013: 594631
        • Landis J.R.
        • Koch G.G.
        The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
        Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174
        • Panjabi M.M.
        • Walter S.D.
        • Karuda M.
        • et al.
        Correlations of radiographic analysis of healing fractures with strength: a statistical analysis of experimental osteotomies.
        J Orthop Res. 1985; 3: 212-218
        • Anari J.B.
        • Mehta S.
        • Ahn J.
        • et al.
        The utility of digital tomosynthesis to the practicing orthopaedic trauma surgeon: a case series.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30: e59-63
        • Minoda Y.
        • Yoshida T.
        • Sugimoto K.
        • et al.
        Detection of small periprosthetic bone defects after total knee arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29: 2280-2284
        • Marsell R.
        • Einhorn T.A.
        The biology of fracture healing.
        Injury. 2011; 42: 551-555
        • Tang H.
        • Yang D.
        • Guo S.
        • et al.
        Digital tomosynthesis with metal artifact reduction for assessing cementless hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic cohort study of 48 patients.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 45: 1523-1532
        • Whelan D.B.
        • Bhandari M.
        • McKee M.D.
        • et al.
        Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the healing of tibial fractures after intramedullary fixation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84: 15-18
        • Filli L.
        • Marcon M.
        • Scholz B.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a prototype correction algorithm to reduce metal artefacts in flat detector computed tomography of scaphoid fixation screws.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2014; 43: 1705-1712
        • Finkenstaedt T.
        • Morsbach F.
        • Calcagni M.
        • et al.
        Metallic artifacts from internal scaphoid fracture fixation screws: comparison between C-arm flat-panel, cone-beam, and multidetector computed tomography.
        Invest Radiol. 2014; 49: 532-539