Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 7 , Pages 536-548, July 2010

Non FDG PET

  • C. Nanni

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: C. Nanni, UO Medicina Nucleare, Ospedale S.Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti n.9, 40138 Bologna, Italy. Tel.: +39(0) 51 6363187.
  • ,
  • L. Fantini
  • ,
  • S. Nicolini
  • ,
  • S. Fanti

Nuclear Medicine Unit, Policlinico S.Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Received 30 October 2009; received in revised form 9 March 2010; accepted 15 March 2010.

2- [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) is the radiopharmaceutical most frequently used for clinical positron emission tomography (PET). However, FDG cannot be used for many oncological, cardiological, or neurological conditions, either because the abnormal tissue does not concentrate it, or because the tissues under investigation demonstrate high physiological glucose uptake. Consequently, alternative PET tracers have been produced and introduced into clinical practice. The most important compounds in routine practice are 11C-choline and 18F-choline, mainly for the evaluation of prostate cancer; 1C-methionine for brain tumours; 118F-DOPA (18F- deoxiphenilalanine) for neuroendocrine tumours and movement disorders; 68Ga-DOTANOC (tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid-[1-Nal3]-octreotide) and other somatostatin analogues for neuroendocrine tumours; 11C-acetate for prostate cancer and hepatic masses and 18F-FLT (3ٰ-deoxy-3ٰ-fluorothymidine) for a number of malignant tumours.

Another impetus for the development of new tracers is to enable the investigation of biological processes in tumours other than glucose metabolism. This is especially important in the field of response assessment, where there are new agents that are targeted more specifically at angiogenesis, hypoxia, apoptosis and other processes.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(10)00179-0

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.03.012

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 7 , Pages 536-548, July 2010