Journal Home
Search for

Volume 65, Issue 8, Pages 623-628 (August 2010)


View previous. 8 of 22 View next.

Classification of non-aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: CT correlation to the clinical outcome

S. NayakaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, A.B. Kunzb, K. Kieslingerb, G. Ladurnerbc, M. Killerbc

Received 15 October 2009; received in revised form 29 December 2009; accepted 8 January 2010. published online 21 June 2010.

Aim

To propose a new computed tomography (CT)-based classification system for non-aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), which predicts patients' discharge clinical outcome and helps to prioritize appropriate patient management.

Methods and materials

A 5-year, retrospective, two-centre study was carried out involving 1486 patients presenting with SAH. One hundred and ninety patients with non-aneurysmal SAH were included in the study. Initial cranial CT findings at admission were correlated with the patients’ discharge outcomes measured using the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS). A CT-based classification system (type 1–4) was devised based on the topography of the initial haemorrhage pattern.

Results

Seventy-five percent of the patients had type 1 haemorrhage and all these patients had a good clinical outcome with a discharge MRS of ≤1. Eight percent of the patients presented with type 2 haemorrhage, 62% of which were discharged with MRS of ≤1 and 12% of patients had MRS 3 or 4. Type 3 haemorrhage was found in 10%, of which 16% had good clinical outcome, but 53% had moderate to severe disability (MRS 3 and 4) and 5% were discharged with severe disability (MRS 5). Six percent of patients presented with type 4 haemorrhage of which 42% of the patients had moderate to severe disability (MRS 3 and 4), 42% had severe disability and one-sixth of the patients died. Highly significant differences were found between type 1(1a and 1b) and type 2 (p=0.003); type 2 and type 3 (p=0.002); type 3 and type 4 (p=0.001).

Conclusion

Haemorrhages of the type 1 category are usually benign and do not warrant an extensive battery of clinical and radiological investigations. Type 2 haemorrhages have a varying prognosis and need to be investigated and managed along similar lines as that of an aneurysmal haemorrhage with emphasis towards radiological investigation. Type 3 and type 4 haemorrhages need to be extensively investigated to find an underlying cause.

a Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, Princes Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 7LN, UK

b University Clinic of Neurology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria

c Neuroscience Institute, Christian Doppler Clinic, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria

Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: S. Nayak, Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, Princes Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 7LN, UK. Tel.: +44 7813685324.

PII: S0009-9260(10)00149-2

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.022


View previous. 8 of 22 View next.