Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 8 , Pages 584-592 , August 2010

Imaging in gastrointestinal stromal tumours: current status and future directions

  • R. Kochhar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. Tel.: +44 161 4463053; fax: +44 161 4463827.
  • ,
  • P. Manoharan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • ,
  • M. Leahy

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • ,
  • M.B. Taylor

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

Received 5 January 2010 ,Revised 27 January 2010 ,Accepted 3 February 2010.

  • Image Result

    Primary GIST with dumbbell-type morphology. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates a large, solid, lobulate mass with both intraluminal and exophytic components related to the stomach with central l

    Primary GIST with dumbbell-type morphology. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates a large, solid, lobulate mass with both intraluminal and exophytic components related to the stomach with central low attenuation (arrow), consistent with a typical morphology for gastric GIST.

  • Image Result
    Metastatic GIST with complicated hepatic metastases. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates multiple hepatic metastases in both lobes of the liver, several of these demonstrate a fluid–fluid level (

    Metastatic GIST with complicated hepatic metastases. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates multiple hepatic metastases in both lobes of the liver, several of these demonstrate a fluid–fluid level (arrow heads) likely due to internal haemorrhage, a known complication of GISTs. Note also the primary gastric GIST (arrow) showing internal calcific areas likely secondary to treatment.

  • Image Result
    Postoperative assessment of risk of relapse. M, mitotic figures; hpf, high power field; int, intermediate; V, very.

    Postoperative assessment of risk of relapse. M, mitotic figures; hpf, high power field; int, intermediate; V, very.

  • Image Result
    Follow-up schedule in organ-confined operable GISTs.

    Follow-up schedule in organ-confined operable GISTs.

  • Image Result
    Histopathologic appearances (haematoxylin and eosin stain, ×400) of primary and post-treatment GISTs. A pre-treatment biopsy specimen (a) reveals a cellular lesion with frequent mitotic figures. After

    Histopathologic appearances (haematoxylin and eosin stain, ×400) of primary and post-treatment GISTs. A pre-treatment biopsy specimen (a) reveals a cellular lesion with frequent mitotic figures. After 6 weeks of imatinib treatment histopathological examination now demonstrates large areas of predominant myxoid degeneration (b).

  • Image Result
    Pitfalls of response assessment showing increase in size but with cystic change. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT (a) demonstrates an exophytic gastric GIST with soft-tissue elements (short arrow) and mult

    Pitfalls of response assessment showing increase in size but with cystic change. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT (a) demonstrates an exophytic gastric GIST with soft-tissue elements (short arrow) and multiple hepatic metastases. The largest hepatic lesion demonstrates a fluid–fluid level (long arrow). (b) Follow-up CT 3 months post-treatment with imatinib demonstrates that both the primary GIST (short arrow) and the hepatic metastases (long arrow) have increased in size suggesting disease progression on conventional RECIST criteria. The lesions, however, now show predominant cystic attenuation and this is in keeping with treatment response despite the slight increase in size. (c) Follow-up CT at 6 months post-treatment demonstrates that the cystic change is maintained and now there is a decrease in size of both the gastric GIST (short arrow) and the hepatic metastases (long arrow) in keeping with continued response to treatment. Decrease in size can occur several months after cystic change limiting early response assessment by standard RECIST criteria.

  • Image Result
    Pitfalls of response assessment with development of spurious new liver lesions. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT (a) in the portal venous phase demonstrates an exophytic gastric GIST and unremarkable appea

    Pitfalls of response assessment with development of spurious new liver lesions. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT (a) in the portal venous phase demonstrates an exophytic gastric GIST and unremarkable appearances of the liver. Follow-up post-imatinib treatment CT at 3 months (b) demonstrates multiple apparently new hypodense hepatic lesions (arrow heads) and a decrease in size of the primary gastric GIST (arrow). Findings are in keeping with a partial response to treatment despite the spurious new hepatic lesions. This should not be misinterpreted as disease progression as these appearances are due to post-treatment cystic change, which makes the hepatic lesions visible on the portal venous phase images; the lesions were previously isodense and apparently not seen.

  • Image Result
    Limited disease progression in GISTs with a nodule-within-a mass pattern. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT (a) demonstrates a predominantly low-density mass in the left supracolic omental region (arrow) wi

    Limited disease progression in GISTs with a nodule-within-a mass pattern. Axial, contrast-enhanced CT (a) demonstrates a predominantly low-density mass in the left supracolic omental region (arrow) with focal calcific areas in a patient taking imatinib for metastatic GIST. Follow-up CT (b) after 3 months demonstrates the development of a new, enhancing, solid nodule in the inferior portion of the previously noted supracolic omental mass (arrow), which otherwise has shown no significant change in size, in keeping with limited disease progression.

  • Image Result
    Response assessment on PET/CT. Baseline PET/CT image (a) performed in a patient with a metastatic GIST to assess response to a clinical trial drug after second-line treatment failed to show response.

    Response assessment on PET/CT. Baseline PET/CT image (a) performed in a patient with a metastatic GIST to assess response to a clinical trial drug after second-line treatment failed to show response. High-grade FDG uptake is seen in a primary small bowel GIST (short arrows) and also in the hepatic metastases. Four-week follow-up PET/CT (b) demonstrates persistent high-grade uptake in the primary tumour (short arrows) and in several new hepatic lesions (long arrows). Findings are in keeping with progressive disease.

PII: S0009-9260(10)00102-9

doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.02.006

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 8 , Pages 584-592 , August 2010