Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 6 , Pages 447-452, June 2010

Optimization of metal artefact reduction (MAR) sequences for MRI of total hip prostheses

  • A.P. Toms

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital Trust, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: Department of Radiology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, UK. Tel.: +44 1603 286104; fax: +44 1603 286077.
  • ,
  • C. Smith-Bateman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital Trust, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, UK
  • ,
  • P.N. Malcolm

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital Trust, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, UK
  • ,
  • J. Cahir

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital Trust, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, UK
  • ,
  • M. Graves

      Affiliations

    • University Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK

Received 26 September 2009; accepted 1 December 2009. published online 20 April 2010.

Aim

To describe the relative contribution of matrix size and bandwidth to artefact reduction in order to define optimal sequence parameters for metal artefact reduction (MAR) sequences for MRI of total hip prostheses.

Methods and materials

A phantom was created using a Charnley total hip replacement. Mid-coronal T1-weighted (echo time 12ms, repetition time 400ms) images through the prosthesis were acquired with increasing bandwidths (150, 300, 454, 592, and 781Hz/pixel) and increasing matrixes of 128, 256, 384, 512, 640, and 768 pixels square. Signal loss from the prosthesis and susceptibility artefact was segmented using an automated tool.

Results

Over 90% of the achievable reduction in artefacts was obtained with matrixes of 256×256 or greater and a receiver bandwidth of approximately 400Hz/pixel or greater. Thereafter increasing the receiver bandwidth or matrix had little impact on reducing susceptibility artefacts. Increasing the bandwidth produced a relative fall in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of between 49 and 56% for a given matrix, but, in practice, the image quality was still satisfactory even with the highest bandwidth and largest matrix sizes. The acquisition time increased linearly with increasing matrix parameters.

Conclusion

Over 90% of the achievable metal artefact reduction can be realized with mid-range matrices and receiver bandwidths on a clinical 1.5T system. The loss of SNR from increasing receiver bandwidth, is preferable to long acquisition times, and therefore, should be the main tool for reducing metal artefact.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(10)00098-X

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.12.014

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 6 , Pages 447-452, June 2010