Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 5 , Pages 382-386, May 2010

Fatigue-type stress fractures of the lower limb associated with fibrous cortical defects/non-ossifying fibromas in the skeletally immature

  • A. Shimal

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK
  • ,
  • A.M. Davies

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK
  • ,
  • S.L.J. James

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: S.L.J. James, Department of Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.
  • ,
  • R.J. Grimer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK

Received 23 September 2009; received in revised form 11 January 2010; accepted 13 January 2010. published online 05 April 2010.

Aim

To investigate the association of a fatigue-type stress fracture and a fibrous cortical defect/non-ossifying fibroma (FCD/NOF) of the lower limb long bones in skeletally immature patients.

Materials and methods

The patient database of a specialist orthopaedic oncology centre was searched to determine the number of skeletally immature patients (≤16 years of age) over an 18 year period with a lower limb long bone lesion ultimately shown to be a fatigue-type stress fracture. The diagnosis was established by a combination of typical imaging findings of a fatigue-type stress fracture, the absence of aggressive features suggestive of a sarcoma (e.g., interrupted periosteal reaction, cortical breach, and a soft-tissue mass) together with evidence of consolidation or healing on follow-up radiographs and resolution of symptoms over the subsequent weeks. The database was also used to determine the number of skeletally immature cases (≤16 years of age) referred in the same period in which the principal lesion was shown to be a fibrous cortical defect (FCD) or non-ossifying fibroma (NOF) of the lower limb long bones. The clinical and imaging features of those cases common to both groups (i.e., with both a fatigue-type stress fracture and a FCD or NOF) were reviewed.

Results

Six percent of patients (five cases) referred to an orthopaedic oncology unit, who were subsequently shown to have a stress fracture of the lower limb long bones, were found to have a related FCD/NOF. All had been referred with a suggested diagnosis of a bone sarcoma and/or osteomyelitis. The possibility of a stress fracture had been raised in only one case. Four cases involved the proximal tibia and one the distal femur. Radiographs revealed that both lesions arose in the posteromedial cortex in all but one of the cases. The radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features were considered typical of the overlapping pathological features of the lesions.

Conclusions

A sarcoma could be effectively excluded in the absence of true cortical destruction and soft-tissue extension. Both fatigue-type stress fractures and FCD/NOFs occur at similar sites in the long bones. It is postulated that the existence of the latter may cause localized weakening of the bone thereby predisposing to the development of a stress fracture. The co-existence of these two conditions in the skeletally immature should be recognized as the dual pathological processes may contribute to radiological misdiagnosis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(10)00066-8

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.014

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 5 , Pages 382-386, May 2010