Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 259-270, April 2010

Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art

  • E.A.M. O'Flynn

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: E.A.M. O'Flynn, Department of Breast Radiology, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK. Tel.: +44 2032993875; fax: 02032994363.
  • ,
  • A.R.M. Wilson
  • ,
  • M.J. Michell

South East London Breast Screening Programme and National Breast Screening Training Centre, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK

Received 27 June 2009; received in revised form 20 December 2009; accepted 4 January 2010.

Percutaneous image-guided breast biopsy is widely practised to evaluate predominantly non-palpable breast lesions. There has been steady development in percutaneous biopsy techniques. Fine-needle aspiration cytology was the original method of sampling, followed in the early 1990s by large core needle biopsy. The accuracy of both has been improved by ultrasound and stereotactic guidance. Larger bore vacuum-assisted biopsy devices became available in the late 1990s and are now commonplace in most breast units. We review the different types of breast biopsy devices currently available together with various localization techniques used, focusing on their advantages, limitations and current controversial clinical management issues.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(10)00040-1

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.008

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 259-270, April 2010