Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 5 , Pages 358-365, May 2010

Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Y.K. Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital and Medical School, Keum Am Dong, JeonJu, Republic of Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: Y.K. Kim, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonbuk National University Hospital and Medical School, Keum Am Dong, JeonJu, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82 63 250 2314; fax: +82 63 272 0481.
  • ,
  • C.S. Kim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital and Medical School, Keum Am Dong, JeonJu, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Y.M. Han

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital and Medical School, Keum Am Dong, JeonJu, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • G. Park

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital and Medical School, Keum Am Dong, JeonJu, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • S.B. Hwang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital and Medical School, Keum Am Dong, JeonJu, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • H.C. Yu

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, Chonbuk National University Hospital and Medical School, Keum Am Dong, JeonJu, Republic of Korea

Received 22 May 2009; received in revised form 15 September 2009; accepted 23 November 2009. published online 05 April 2010.

Aim

To compare the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

Eighty-nine patients (118 HCCs) who underwent three-dimensional gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and SPIO-enhanced MRI with a mean interval of 4.7 days (range 3–7 days), were included in this study. Two observers reviewed the gadoxetic acid set (unenhanced, early dynamic, 10 and 20 min hepatocyte-phase images) and SPIO set [unenhanced and ferucarbotran-enhanced T1-, T2-turbo spin-echo (TSE), and T2* weighted imaging (WI)] in consensus. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were evaluated using the alternative-free response receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method.

Results

The area under ROC curve (Az value) and sensitivity of the gadoxetic acid set (Az 0.964; sensitivity 90.7%) were significantly higher than those of the SPIO set (Az 0.830; sensitivity 84.7%; p<0.05). There were 14 and seven lesions that were verified only on the gadoxetic acid set and only on the SPIO set, respectively. Four HCCs were clearly revealed as hypointense only on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatocyte phase imaging, but were occult on other sequences, including the SPIO set.

Conclusion

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is better than SPIO-enhanced MRI for the detection of HCCs.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(10)00039-5

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.11.012

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 5 , Pages 358-365, May 2010