Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 325-332, April 2010

Workplace-based assessment in radiology—where to now?

  • K. Augustine

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
  • ,
  • P. McCoubrie

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent. Tel.: +44 1173236341; fax: +44 1173235122.
  • ,
  • J.R. Wilkinson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • L. McKnight

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK

Received 4 June 2009; received in revised form 18 November 2009; accepted 1 December 2009.

Assessment of doctors is in a state of flux. Traditional methods of assessment have been critically examined and found inherently limited. The wholesale shift towards outcome-orientated education in the last 10 years has led to the relatively rapid development of a radically different method of assessment. This method focuses on assessing what doctors do in everyday practice rather than written or practical simulations. Known collectively as “workplace-based assessment” tools, these have been embraced in North America, whereas they have been more cautiously adopted in the UK. However, many of these assessment tools have not been rigorously studied and, moreover, few have been specifically developed for assessing radiologists. However, they are likely to be incorporated into radiology training in the near future. This paper critically analyses both the underpinning assumptions behind this method and the evidence behind existing tools, and looks at the work that is required to develop, adopt or adapt such tools for use in radiology.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(10)00019-X

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.12.004

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 4 , Pages 325-332, April 2010