Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 218-222, March 2010

Criteria for the safe avoidance of needle sampling in young women with solid breast masses

  • A.J. Maxwell

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: A.J. Maxwell, Bolton Breast Unit, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton BL4 0JR, UK. Tel.: +44 1204 390046; fax: +44 1204 390385.
  • ,
  • J.M. Pearson

Bolton Breast Unit, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton BL4 0JR, UK

Received 23 August 2009; received in revised form 12 November 2009; accepted 25 November 2009.

Aim

To establish clinical and ultrasonic criteria by which needle sampling can be safely avoided in young women with solid breast masses.

Materials and methods

The databases of a large hospital were searched for breast cancers, phyllodes tumours, and papillomas diagnosed in women below the age of 30 years. In addition, the clinical and sonographic findings in female patients less than 25 years of age presenting with a solid breast mass over a 1-year period were reviewed.

Results

Nine women with breast cancer, seven with phyllodes, and six with papillomas were found. No delayed diagnoses in those who had ultrasound would have been made if the following criteria had been applied to avoid needle sampling: age less than 25 years; no known risk factors for breast malignancy; mass not rapidly enlarging; smooth discrete mobile mass on clinical examination, or lesion impalpable; well-defined homogeneously isoechoic or mildly hypoechoic solid mass; less than 3cm in greatest dimension; ovoid shape, aligned parallel to the skin surface; smooth or gently lobulated contour (two or three lobulations only; no microlobulation); thin echogenic pseudocapsule; no calcification; no acoustic shadowing. Needle sampling could have been safely avoided in approximately two-thirds of the women reviewed below the age of 25 with a solid breast mass.

Conclusion

Application of the proposed criteria would spare a significant number of young women unnecessary needle sampling.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(09)00420-6

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.11.009

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 218-222, March 2010