Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 213-217 , March 2010

A comparative review of multidetector CT angiography and MRI in the diagnosis of jugular foramen lesions

  • A. Christie

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: ST2 Clinical Radiology, West of Scotland rotation, Department of Radiology, Hairmyres Hospital, East Kilbride, Lanarkshire G75 8RG, Scotland. Tel.: +44 0 7969751167.
  • ,
  • E. Teasdale

Received 6 August 2009 ,Revised 2 November 2009 ,Accepted 8 November 2009.

References 

  1. Tekdemir I, Tuccar E, Aslan A, et al. The jugular foramen — a comparative radioanatomic study. Surg Neurol. 1998;50:557–562
  2. Caldemayer KS, Mathews VP, Azzarelli B, et al. The jugular foramen: a review of anatomy, masses, and imaging characteristics. RadioGraphics. 1997;17:1123–1139
  3. Lowenheim H, Koerbel A, Ebner FH, et al. Differentiating imaging findings in primary and secondary tumors of the jugular foramen. Neurosur Rev. 2006;29:1–11
  4. Noujaim SE, Pattekar MA, Cacciarelli A, et al. Paraganglioma of the temporal bone: role of magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography. Top Magn Resonan Imaging. 2000;11:108–122
  5. Eldevik OP, Gabrielson TO, Jacobsen EA. Imaging findings in Schwannomas of the jugular foramen. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1139–1144
  6. Cristobal R, Metts B, Michel MA, et al. Three dimensional computed tomography angiography in imaging jugular foramen lesions. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:429–430
  7. Van den Berg R, Schepers A, de Bruine FT, et al. The value of MR angiography techniques in the detection of head and neck paragangliomas. Eur J Radiol. 2004;52:240–245
  8. Gilbert ME, Shelton C, McDonald A, et al. Meningioma of the jugular foramen: glomus jugular mimic and surgical challenge. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:25–32
  9. Van den Berg R. Imaging and management of head and neck paragangliomas. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1310–1318
  10. Deng K, Liu C, Ma R, et al. Clinical evaluation of dual-energy bone removal in CT angiography of the head and neck: comparison with conventional bone-subtraction CT angiography. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:534–541
  11. Krishnan A, Mattox DE, Fountain AJ, et al. CT arteriography and venography in pulsatile tinnitus: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1635–1638
  12. Harnsberg HR. Skull base. In:  Harnsberg HR,  Wiggins RH,  Hudgins PA, et al. editor. Diagnostic imaging. head and neck. 1st ed.. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys; 2006;p. 26–35I-3
  13. Van den Berg R, Wasser MNJM, Van Gils APG, et al. Vascularization of head and neck paragangliomas: comparison of three MR angiographic techniques with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:162–170

PII: S0009-9260(09)00407-3

doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.11.006

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 213-217 , March 2010