« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 2
, Pages 133-136
, February 2010
Observer accuracy in the detection of pulmonary nodules on CT: effect of cine frame rate
References
- . The effect of reporting speed on plain film reporting errors. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:971–979
- . Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology. 1975;116:527–532
- Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing. Radiology. 1995;197:73–78
- . Detection of pulmonary nodules with helical CT: comparison of cine and film-based viewing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1611–1614
- Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology. 2004;230:347–352
- . An analysis of perceptual and cognitive factors in radiographic interpretation. Perception. 1980;9:339–344
- Sequential viewing of abdominal CT images at varying rates. Radiology. 1994;191:119–122
- Pulmonary nodule detection with low-dose CT of the lung: agreement among radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:973–978
- The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC): an evaluation of radiologist variability in the identification of lung nodules on CT scans. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:1409–1421
- Assessment of radiologist performance in the detection of pulmonary nodules: dependence on the definition of “truth”. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:28–38
- . Incremental benefit of maximum-intensity-projection images on observer detection of small pulmonary nodules revealed by multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:149–157
- Pulmonary nodule detection on MDCT images: evaluation of diagnostic performance using thin axial images, maximum intensity projections and computer-aided detection. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:3148–3156
- . Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering for 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology. 2007;243:561–569
- . Advanced image processing and computer-aided diagnosis: are we there yet?. J Thorac Imaging. 2008;23:75–76
PII: S0009-9260(09)00360-2
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.05.016
© 2009 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 2
, Pages 133-136
, February 2010
