Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 1 , Pages 40-46, January 2010

Provision of a “same-day” ultrasound service in an inner-city NHS trust: report on experience and lessons learned after the first 2 years

Departments of Radiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK

Received 31 May 2009; received in revised form 13 September 2009; accepted 30 September 2009.

Aim

To assess the effect of changing from an “appointment” to a “same-day” ultrasound (US) service on referral pattern, departmental workload, and patient satisfaction.

Materials and methods

To reduce US waiting time of 3 weeks for routine examinations, a “same-day” service was started for outpatients and general practitioner (GP) patients in September 2006. To examine the effect of this change a retrospective assessment was performed of workload during 1 week in June 2006 (appointments only) and the same week in 2008, 22 months after the implementation of the new service. Distance travelled by patients and waiting time was recorded. Patient satisfaction with the service was assessed by questionnaire in September 2008.

Results

Hospital referrals remained stable, but GP referrals increased from 99 to 367 (270%) and distance travelled by patients increased from a median of 3.1km (range 0.1–12.1km) in 2006 to 4.8km (range 0.2–19.8km) in 2008 (p<0.001). Non-local GP referrals increased from 20/99 in 2006 (20%) to 198/367 in 2008 (54%). The increased workload was managed by flexible working by radiologists and two additional sonographers. Departmental waiting time increased for all patients with same-day patients waiting a median of 35min (interquartile range 19–60min). Ninety-one percent (79/87) of same-day patients rated the service excellent or good, but many requested better information on the waiting time.

Conclusion

There is a demand from GPs for same-day US, and it is feasible in a large hospital with flexible radiology working and increased sonographic staffing. Unless adjacent hospitals offer a similar service, continuing rise in demand could overwhelm the service.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(09)00354-7

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.09.009

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 1 , Pages 40-46, January 2010