Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 1 , Pages 21-25, January 2010

CT-guided injection for ganglion impar blockade: a radiological approach to the management of coccydynia

  • A. Datir

      Affiliations

    • Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: A. Datir, 51 SW 11th Street, Apartment # 1425, Miami, FL, 33130-4152, USA. Tel.: +1 305 744 1014; fax: +1 305 355 4725.
  • ,
  • D. Connell

      Affiliations

    • Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK

Received 14 August 2008; received in revised form 9 August 2009; accepted 18 August 2009.

Aim

To evaluate the role of computed tomography (CT) in needle placement for ganglion impar blocks, and to determine the efficacy of CT-guided ganglion impar blocks in the management of coccydynia.

Materials and methods

The results of ganglion impar blockade in eight patients with coccydynia secondary to trauma or unknown cause were reviewed. The diagnosis of coccydynia was based on clinical history, location of pain, and response to previous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The eight patients were treated with CT-guided ganglion impar blocks to manage their coccyx pain after conservative procedures, including oral medication and cushions, failed to provide relief. All patients were subjected to ganglion impar blocks under a thin-section CT-guided technique for needle placement, using a mixture of bupivacaine and triamcinolone. The patients were followed-up for a period of 6-months.

Results

Eight patients were treated in this study with a total of 11 injections. A technical success of 100% was achieved in all cases with accurate needle placement without any complications and all the patients tolerated the procedure well. Out of eight, three patients (37%) had complete relief of pain on the follow-up intervals up to 6 months. Three out of eight patients (37%), had partial relief of symptoms and a second repeat injection was given at the 3 month interval of the follow-up period. At the end of the 6-month follow-up period, six out of eight patients (75%) experienced symptomatic relief (four complete relief and two partial relief) without any additional resort to conventional pain management. Twenty-five percent (two out of eight) did not have any symptomatic improvement. The mean visual analogue score (VAS) pre-procedure was 8 (range 6–10) and had decreased to 2 (range 0–5) in six out of eight patients.

Conclusion

CT can be used as an imaging method to identify the ganglion and guide the needle in ganglion impar blockade. The advantages of CT-guided injection over those performed under fluoroscopy may include accurate and confident needle placement in the sacro-coccygeal region, ease of wide area coverage, lesser risk of complications due to inadvertent injections into the major pelvic structures, and increased likelihood of reaching the ganglion impar, especially in cases with anatomical variation in the ganglion impar location. These factors may have implications in the overall success rate of ganglion impar blockade.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(09)00323-7

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.08.007

Clinical Radiology
Volume 65, Issue 1 , Pages 21-25, January 2010