Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 12 , Pages 1181-1187, December 2009

Reliability of the bright liver echo pattern in diagnosing steatosis in patients with cryptogenic and HCV-related hypertransaminasaemia

  • M. Soresi

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Medicine and Emerging Pathologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  • ,
  • L. Giannitrapani

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Medicine and Emerging Pathologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  • ,
  • A.M. Florena

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Pathology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  • ,
  • E. La Spada

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Medicine and Emerging Pathologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  • ,
  • V. Di Gesaro

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Medicine and Emerging Pathologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  • ,
  • F. Rappa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Pathology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  • ,
  • A. Alessandri

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Medicine and Emerging Pathologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  • ,
  • S. Tripi

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Medicine and Emerging Pathologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  • ,
  • M. Romano

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Geriatrics, A.R.N.A.S. Garibaldi, Catania, Italy
  • ,
  • G. Montalto

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Medicine and Emerging Pathologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: G. Montalto, Department of Clinical Medicine and Emerging Pathologies, University of Palermo, via del Vespro, 141; 90 127 Palermo, Italy. Tel.: +39 091 6552991; fax: +39 091 6552847.

Received 28 November 2008; received in revised form 20 June 2009; accepted 29 June 2009.

Aim

To evaluate the reliability of the bright liver (BL) echo pattern on ultrasound to detect histological steatosis in chronic cryptogenic hypertransaminasaemia (CCH) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related forms of hypertransaminasaemia.

Materials and methods

One hundred and fifty patients, 54 with CCH and 96 with HCV hypertransaminasaemia (76 genotype 1/2 and 20 genotype 3), were enrolled. Histological steatosis was measured as the percentage of hepatocytes involved. The reliability of the BL sign was estimated using the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.

Results

Histological steatosis was present in 102/150 patients (68%) divided into 59/96 (62%) in the HCV group and 43/54 (79.6%) in the CCH group (χ2=4.4; p=0.035). In a multivariate analysis, the variable associated with the BL echo pattern was steatosis percentage (p=0.0018). Steatosis percentage was higher in CCH group than in the HCV genotype 1/2 and 3 groups (p=0.02). The sensitivity of the BL echo pattern was 88% in the CCH group [confidence interval (CI) 95% 74–95] versus 61% (CI 95% 44–73) in the HCV genotype 1/2 group. The CI indicates that ultrasound can provide evidence for steatosis in a statistically significant way in the CCH versus HCV genotype 1/2 patients. In the genotype 3 group, the sensitivity was high (90%), but the limited number of cases limited the statistical significance due to the high CI.

Conclusion

In CCH the BL echo pattern has excellent reliability in diagnosing steatosis, better than in HCV hypertransaminasaemia because of the higher prevalence and extent of steatosis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(09)00296-7

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.06.013

Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 12 , Pages 1181-1187, December 2009