Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 11 , Pages 1081-1087 , November 2009

Ultrasonic microbubble contrast agents and the transplant kidney

  • D.H. Kay

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: D.H. Kay, Department of Radiology, Western Infirmary, Dumbarton Road, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK. Tel.: +44 0141 211 2660; fax: +44 0141 337 3416.
  • ,
  • M. Mazonakis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Renal Medicine, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
  • ,
  • C. Geddes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Renal Medicine, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
  • ,
  • G. Baxter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

Received 3 February 2009 ,Revised 23 June 2009 ,Accepted 29 June 2009.

References 

  1. Gramiak R, Shak PM, Kramer DH. Ultrasound cardiography: contrast studies in anatomy and function. Radiology. 1969;92:939–948
  2. Warren P, Garrett W, Kossoff G. The liquid-filled stomach — an ultrasound window to the upper abdomen. J Clin Ultrasound. 1978;6:315–320
  3. Valdez-Cruz LM, Sahn DJ. Ultrasonic contrast studies for the detection of cardiac shunts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;3:978–985
  4. Solbiati L, Martegani A, Leen E, et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound of liver diseases. New York: Springer; 2003;
  5. Hyun-Jung J, Kim TK, Wilson SR. Imaging of malignant liver masses. Ultrasound Q. 2006;22:19–29
  6. Tae Kyoung K, Hyun-Jung J, Wilson S. Benign liver masses: imaging with microbubble contrast agents. Ultrasound Q. 2006;22:31–39
  7. Meloni MF, Livraghi T, Filice C, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumours. Ultrasound Q. 2006;22:41–47
  8. Correas JM, Claudon M, Tranquart F. The kidney: imaging with microbubble contrast agents. Ultrasound Q. 2006;22:53–66
  9. Wei K. Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1135–1140
  10. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation. 1998;97:473–483
  11. Lucidarme O. Blood flow quantification with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Radiology. 2003;228:473–479
  12. Hancock J. Evaluation of myocardial, hepatic and renal perfusion in a variety of clinical conditions using an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent and second harmonic imaging. Heart. 2005;81(6):636–641
  13. Thorelius L. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for extrahepatic lesions: preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol. 2004;51(Suppl.):S31–S38
  14. Genkins SM, Sanfilippo FP, Carroll BA. Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants: lack of sensitivity and specificity in establishing pathologic diagnosis. Am J Radiol. 1989;152:535–539
  15. Kelzc F, Pozniak MA, Pirsch JD, et al. Pyramidal appearance and resistive index: insensitive and nonspecific indicators of acute renal transplant rejection. Am J Radiol. 1990;155:531–535
  16. Rifkin MD, Needleman L, Pasto ME, et al. Evaluation of renal transplant rejection by duplex Doppler examination: value of the resistive index. Am J Radiol. 1987;148:759–762
  17. Rigsby CM, Taylor KJW, Weltin G, et al. Renal allografts in acute rejection: evaluation using duplex sonography. Radiology. 1986;158:375–378
  18. Levey AS. A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:A0828
  19. Lencioni R, Pinto S, Cioni D, et al. Contrast enhanced Doppler ultrasound of the renal artery stenosis. Echocardiography. 1999;16:767–773
  20. Claudon M, Barnevolt CE, Taylor GA, et al. Renal blood flow in pigs: changes depicted with contrast enhanced harmonic US imaging during acute urinary obstruction. Radiology. 1999;212:725–731
  21. Ardine de wit G, Ramsteign D, de Cherro F. Economic evaluation of end stage renal dialysis treatment. Health Policy. 1998;44:215–232

PII: S0009-9260(09)00252-9

doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.06.010

Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 11 , Pages 1081-1087 , November 2009