Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 11 , Pages 1081-1087, November 2009

Ultrasonic microbubble contrast agents and the transplant kidney

  • D.H. Kay

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: D.H. Kay, Department of Radiology, Western Infirmary, Dumbarton Road, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK. Tel.: +44 0141 211 2660; fax: +44 0141 337 3416.
  • ,
  • M. Mazonakis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Renal Medicine, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
  • ,
  • C. Geddes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Renal Medicine, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
  • ,
  • G. Baxter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

Received 3 February 2009; received in revised form 23 June 2009; accepted 29 June 2009.

Aim

To evaluate the potential application of microbubble agents in the immediate post-transplant period, by studying contrast uptake and washout, and to correlate these values with clinical indices, and thus, assess the potential prognostic value of this technique.

Materials and methods

The study group comprised 20 consecutive renal transplant patients within 7 days of transplantation. Sonovue was administered as an intravenous bolus with continuous imaging of the transplant kidney at low mechanical index (MI) for 1min post-injection. These data were analysed off-line by two observers, and time intensity curves (TIC) for the upper, mid, and lower poles constructed. Within each pole, a region of interest (5mm square) was placed over the cortex, medullary pyramid, and interlobar artery, resulting in a total of nine TIC for each patient. TIC parameters included the arrival time (AT), time to peak (TTP), peak intensity (Max), gradient of the slope (M), and the area under curve (AUC).

Results

For both observers there was good agreement for all values measured from the cortex and medulla, but poor interobserver correlation for the vascular values. In addition, there was only agreement for these values in the upper and mid-pole of the transplant with poor agreement for the lower pole values. The mid-pole of the transplant kidney was chosen as the point of measurement for subsequent studies. Mid-pole values were correlated with clinical data and outcome over the 3-month post-transplant period. Renal microbubble perfusion correlated with the transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3 months post-transplantation (p=0.016).

Discussion

In conclusion, this is the first study to confirm reproducibility of the Sonovue TIC data in transplant patients and to quantify regional variation and perfusion. The statistically significant estimates of transplant perfusion may be of future benefit to transplant recipients and potentially utilized as a prognostic tool. However, a more in depth study will be required to support or refute these early study findings.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(09)00252-9

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.06.010

Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 11 , Pages 1081-1087, November 2009