Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 10 , Pages 961-971, October 2009

Hip arthroplasty. Part 2: normal and abnormal radiographic findings

  • E. Pluot

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • E.T. Davis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • M. Revell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • A.M. Davies

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • S.L.J. James

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: S.L.J. James, Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Road, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK. Tel.: +44 121 685 4135; fax: +44 121 685 4134.

Received 29 January 2009; received in revised form 8 May 2009; accepted 11 May 2009.

This review addresses the normal and abnormal radiographic findings that can be encountered during the follow-up of patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). The relative significance of different patterns of radiolucency, bone sclerosis, and component position is discussed. The normal or pathological significance of these findings is correlated with design, surface, and fixation of the prosthetic components. It is essential to have a good knowledge of expected and unexpected radiological evolution according to the different types of prostheses. This paper emphasizes the importance of serial studies compared with early postoperative radiographs during follow-up in order to report accurately any sign of prosthetic failure and trigger prompt specialist referral. Basic technical guidelines and schedule recommendations for radiological follow-up are summarized.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(09)00177-9

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.05.002

Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 10 , Pages 961-971, October 2009