Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 10 , Pages 954-960 , October 2009

Hip arthroplasty. Part 1: prosthesis terminology and classification

  • E. Pluot

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
    • ,
  • E.T. Davis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
    • ,
  • M. Revell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
    • ,
  • A.M. Davies

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
    • ,
  • S.L.J. James

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: S.L.J. James, Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Road, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK. Tel.: +44 121 685 4135; fax: +44 121 685 4134.

Received 29 January 2009 ,Revised 23 March 2009 ,Accepted 31 March 2009.

References 

  1. National Joint Registry . 4th Annual report. Hemel Hempstead: NJR Centre, Northgate Information Solutions; 2007;
  2. Hardy DC, Reinus WR, Totty WG, et al. Arthrography after total hip arthroplasty: utility of postambulation radiographs. Skeletal Radiol. 1988;17:20–23
  3. Keogh CF, Munk PL, Gee R, et al. Imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:115–120
  4. Leung S, Naudie D, Kitamura N, et al. Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:592–597
  5. Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH, et al. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:609–614
  6. Stumpe KD, Notzli HP, Zanetti M, et al. FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy. Radiology. 2004;231:333–341
  7. Sugimoto H, Hirose I, Miyaoka E, et al. Low-field-strength MR imaging of failed hip arthroplasty: association of femoral periprosthetic signal intensity with radiographic, surgical, and pathologic findings. Radiology. 2003;229:718–723
  8. Walde TA, Weiland DE, Leung SB, et al. Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;138–144
  9. Bauer TW, Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty 1. Mechanisms of implant fixation. Skeletal Radiol. 1999;28:423–432
  10. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N, Nivbrant B. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;103–112

PII: S0009-9260(09)00176-7

doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.03.011

Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 10 , Pages 954-960 , October 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution