Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 7 , Pages 690-698, July 2009

Are UK radiologists satisfied with the training and support received in suspected child abuse?

  • R.S. Leung

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
  • ,
  • C. Nwachuckwu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatrics, Whipps Cross Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • A. Pervaiz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
  • ,
  • C. Wallace

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Royal Liverpool Childrens NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
  • ,
  • C. Landes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Royal Liverpool Childrens NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
  • ,
  • A.C. Offiah

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: A. C. Offiah, Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK. Tel.: +44 20 74059200x8179; fax: +44 20 78298665.

Received 21 November 2008; received in revised form 6 February 2009; accepted 16 February 2009.

Aim

To determine current practice and perceptions of the adequacy of training and support received for the reporting of skeletal surveys in suspected physical child abuse.

Materials and methods

A list of telephone numbers of UK hospitals with a radiology department was obtained from the Royal College of Radiologists. One hundred hospitals were then randomly selected for inclusion in the survey. An 18-item questionnaire was successfully administered to consultant radiologists from 84 departments.

Results

Sixty-one percent of departments had a named radiologist to report their skeletal surveys, 16% assigned surveys to a random radiologist, and 23% referred them elsewhere. Only 52% of departments had a dedicated paediatric radiologist, thus in a significant proportion of departments (25%) initial reports on skeletal surveys for physical abuse were provided by non-paediatric radiologists. Fifteen percent did not have ready access to a paediatric radiology opinion. Sixty-one percent thought that the service could be improved. Expert evidence was provided by 5% of respondents. Seventy-three percent would never consider providing expert evidence, even if given adequate radiology and/or legal training.

Conclusion

The survey shows significant dissatisfaction amongst consultant radiologists with the current service, confirms a low number of paediatric radiologists taking on this work, and suggests the potential to increase numbers of radiology child abuse experts by 27% if given improved training and support. Appropriate service and education strategies should be implemented.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(09)00103-2

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.02.012

Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 7 , Pages 690-698, July 2009