Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 628-636, June 2009

Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients

  • B. Mesurolle

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, McGill University, and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: B. Mesurolle, Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, PQ, H3G 1A4, Canada. Tel.: +1 514 934 1934x37602; fax: +1 514 934 8263.
  • ,
  • M. El-Khoury

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, McGill University, and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • K. Khetani

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Cedar Breast Clinic, McGill University, and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • N. Abdullah

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, McGill University, and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • L. Joseph

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • E. Kao

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, McGill University, and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada

Received 24 March 2008; received in revised form 8 December 2008; accepted 22 December 2008.

Aim

To present the sonographic findings of mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with histopathologic correlation.

Materials and methods

The mammographic and ultrasonographic presentations of 47 radiographically non-calcified DCIS lesions in 35 patients were retrospectively analysed. Histological characteristics (architectural appearance, nuclear grade, percent of involved lobules, and presence of necrosis) were reviewed.

Results

Seventeen lesions were not mammographically visible (17/47, 36%). Ultrasonographically, these lesions showed an irregular shape (28/47, 60%), microlobulated margins (34/47, 72%) and abrupt interfaces (42/47, 90%). Only 11% (5/47) displayed posterior shadowing. The echotexture of these lesions was most frequently complex (29/47, 62%); therefore, they were divided into two types: type I (24 cases), which were predominantly solid with cystic components, and type II (five cases), which were predominantly cystic with a solid intra-cystic component. A trend to have greater than 50% DCIS cells in cancerous lobules was observed in masses displaying type I echotexture (difference=36%, 95% confidence interval 10.6–62.5) and microlobulated margins (difference=32%, 95% confidence interval 5.1–58.7).

Conclusion

Ultrasonographically detected radiographically non-calcified DCIS commonly displays an irregular shape, microlobulated margins, and complex echotexture, giving a “pseudomicrocystic” appearance. Microlobulated margins and “pseudomicrocystic” echotexture seem to be associated with a cancerization of the lobules.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(09)00067-1

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.12.013

Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 628-636, June 2009