« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 4
, Pages 386-394
, April 2009
Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports
References
- . The radiological report: what is useful for the referring physician?. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1988;39:140–143
- Radiology reports: how much descriptive detail is enough?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:803–806
- . Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:591–598
- Computer-based speech recognition as a replacement for medical transcription. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:23–25
- . Voting procedures: a summary analysis. Br J Polit Sci. 1983;13:181–208
- . Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus. 1959;88:571–591
- . A consistent extension of Condorcet's election principle. SIAM J Appl Math. 1978;35:285–300
- . Radiology reporting—where does the radiologist's duty end?. Lancet. 2006;367:443–445
- . Free text versus structured format: information transfer efficiency of radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:804–812
- . A framework for improving radiology reporting. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:159–167
- Structured reporting: coronary CT angiography: a white paper from the American College of Radiology and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5:796–800
- Grieve FM, Plumb AA, Khan SH. Radiology reporting: a general practitioner perspective. Proceedings of the UK Radiological Congress 2008, 2–4th June 2008, British Journal of Radiology Congress Series 2008.
PII: S0009-9260(08)00493-5
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.11.009
© 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 4
, Pages 386-394
, April 2009
