« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 4
, Pages 397-402
, April 2009
Do the terms “proximal” and “distal” cause confusion amongst radiologists and other clinicians?
References
- . Standards for the reporting and interpretation of imaging investigations. London: Royal College of Radiologists; 2006;
- To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:349–355
- . Re: To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:856
- Introduction. In: Snell RS editors. Clinical anatomy by regions. 8th ed.. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008;p. 1–43
- Basic anatomical concepts. In: Gosling JA, Harris PF, Humpherson JR editor. Human anatomy. 5th ed.. Philadelphia, USA: Mosby Elsevier; 2008;p. 2–20
- Introduction and systemic overview. In: Standring S editors. Gray's Anatomy. 39th ed.. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005;p. 1–4
- . Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Rontgen image. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:1085–1098
- . Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:409–430
- . Radlex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. RadioGraphics. 2006;26:1595–1597
PII: S0009-9260(08)00489-3
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.11.004
© 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 4
, Pages 397-402
, April 2009
