Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 373-380, April 2009

Sensitivity and specificity of eight CT signs in the preoperative diagnosis of internal mesenteric hernia following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

  • J.D. Iannuccilli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: J. D. Iannuccilli, Rhode Island Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903, USA. Tel.: +1 401 258-8968; fax: +1 401 444-5017.
  • ,
  • D. Grand

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
  • ,
  • B.L. Murphy

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
  • ,
  • P. Evangelista

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
  • ,
  • G.D. Roye

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
  • ,
  • W. Mayo-Smith

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Received 13 August 2008; received in revised form 14 October 2008; accepted 26 October 2008.

Aim

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of eight previously reported computed tomography (CT) signs in diagnosing internal mesenteric hernia following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Materials and methods

Preoperative CT images of nine patients with surgically proven internal mesenteric hernia as a complication of gastric bypass surgery and 10 matched control patients were reviewed in a blinded fashion by three radiologists. The presence of eight previously reported signs of internal mesenteric hernia was assessed: mesenteric swirl sign, hurricane eye sign, mushroom sign, small bowel obstruction, clustered small bowel loops, small bowel other than duodenum located behind the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), presence of the jejunal anastomosis to the right of the midline, and engorged mesenteric lymph nodes. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each sign, as well as inter-observer reliability in recognizing these signs.

Results

Mesenteric swirl was the most predictive sign of internal hernia (sensitivity 78–100%, specificity 80–90%). Other CT signs showed good specificity (70–100%), but sensitivities were low (0–44%). The presence of a small-bowel obstruction and engorged mesenteric nodes was found to be 100% specific in predicting the presence of an underlying hernia. There was substantial inter-observer agreement in detecting mesenteric swirl sign (κ=0.48–0.79), but agreement was relatively poor for all other signs.

Conclusion

Mesenteric swirl is an easily recognized CT sign, and is the best indicator of internal hernia following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Other reported CT signs are diagnostically insensitive. The presence of small-bowel obstruction with engorged mesenteric nodes is highly specific in diagnosing internal mesenteric hernia.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(08)00438-8

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.10.008

Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 4 , Pages 373-380, April 2009