Incremental detection of coronary artery disease by assessment of non-calcified plaque on coronary CT angiography
Aim
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the improved assessment of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden by measurement of non-calcified plaque in addition to calcified plaque using CT coronary angiography (CTA).
Materials and methods
Low to intermediate-risk outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease were prospectively recruited. Patients underwent CTA and calcium scoring in addition to invasive angiography. The presence of plaque (calcified, non-calcified, and mixed) was analysed on a per segment basis (percentage of segments with disease) with stratification by calcium score (CS).
Results
Seventy-six patients were enrolled of whom 30 had a CS of 0, 26 had a CS of 1–200, and 20 had a CS of >200. One thousand, one hundred and two segments were analysed using CTA and invasive angiography. The prevalence of segments with calcified or mixed plaque was 3.1% (n
=
13) for a CS of 0, 15.1% (n
=
57) for a CS of 1–200, and 50% (n
=
142) for a CS of >200 (all p
<
0.0001). The proportion of segments with non-calcified plaque alone was low and similar among the three groups: 5.4% (n
=
23; CS
=
0), 8.2% (n
=
32; CS
=
1–200), and 8.6% (n
=
25; CS
=
>200), (CS
=
0 versus CS
=
>200; p
=
0.04, others p
=
ns). The relative increase in diseased segments by additional assessment of non-calcified plaque was greatest for patients with a CS of 0 (173%) versus a CS of 1–200 (55%), and a CS of >200 (17%).
Conclusion
CTA offers increased relative incremental detection of non-calcified plaque, particularly in those with negative CS; however, the absolute detection of non-calcified plaque in those with negative CS is low. The prognostic significance of non-calcified plaque for the prediction of cardiac events, particularly in patients with low CS, requires continued study.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0009-9260(08)00431-5
doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.09.009
© 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
