Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 1 , Pages 70-73, January 2009

Can we use pulsed fluoroscopy to decrease the radiation dose during video fluoroscopic feeding studies in children?

  • M.D. Cohen

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: Department of Radiology, Riley Hospital for Children, 702 Barnhill Dr., Room 1053, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. Tel.: +1 317 873 6586; fax: +1 317 274 2920.

Department of Radiology, Riley Children's Hospital, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Received 10 June 2008; received in revised form 9 July 2008; accepted 11 July 2008.

Aim

To investigate whether it is possible to reduce the radiation dose during video fluoroscopic feeding studies below the current 30frames/s (continuous fluoroscopy).

Methods

Ten consecutive children who had supraglottic penetration while swallowing barium were evaluated as part of a video fluoroscopic feeding study. All fluoroscopic studies were performed with a pulse rate of 30frames/s. Frame by frame analysis was performed of the first episode of penetration in each patient to determine on how many image frames the penetration could be detected.

Results

Supraglottic penetration occurred very rapidly. In seven of the 10 patients, full-depth penetration was only seen on one image frame. In no patient was the full-depth penetration seen in greater than two imaging frames.

Conclusion

Decreasing the fluoroscopic pulse rate cannot be used as a method of decreasing radiation dose during performance of video fluoroscopic studies because it will potentially result in non-detection of episodes of supraglottic penetration of liquid barium.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(08)00330-9

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.07.011

Clinical Radiology
Volume 64, Issue 1 , Pages 70-73, January 2009