« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 8
, Pages 888-894
, August 2008
The UK nephrostomy audit. Can a voluntary registry produce robust performance data?
References
- . Good Medical Practice. 2006;http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/maintaining_good_medical_practice/performance.asp[accessed 19.03.07]
- . http://accreditation.rcr.ac.uk/index.asp?PageID = 1[accessed 19.03.07]
- . A review of radiologically guided percutaneous nephrostomies in 303 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8:769–774
- . Percutaneous nephrostomy: techniques, indications and results. Urology. 1975;6:28–434
- . Percutaneous nephrostomy: a series and review of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130:75–82
- Lang EK, Price ET. Redefinitions of indications for percutaneous nephrostomy. Radiology; 147: 19–426.
- . Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy: technical success based on level of operator experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5:327–330
- . Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy: results and complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5:135–139
- Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998;160:1260–1264
- . Major complications after percutaneous nephrostomy — lessons from a department audit. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:171–179
- Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: comparison between crude and risk stratified data. BMJ. 2003;327:13–17
PII: S0009-9260(08)00099-8
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.10.021
© 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 8
, Pages 888-894
, August 2008
