Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 8 , Pages 864-870, August 2008

Embolization of renal angiomyolipoma: immediate complications and long-term outcomes

  • J. Lenton

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, St James University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 7TF, UK
  • ,
  • D. Kessel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, St James University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 7TF, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: D. Kessel, Department of Radiology, The Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 7TF, UK. Tel.: +44 113 206 4047; fax: +44 113 206 4691.
  • ,
  • A.F. Watkinson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK

Received 17 August 2007; received in revised form 3 January 2008; accepted 15 February 2008.

Aims

To report the outcomes of elective and emergency embolization of renal angiomyolipoma and describe an angiographic sign that will help localize the symptomatic aneurysm in emergency cases.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing embolization of renal angiomyolipoma at a two centres between 1998–2007. Indications for treatment and angiographic images were reviewed. Incidence of acute rupture during embolization was noted.

Results

Seventeen patients underwent 23 episodes of embolization using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles, bead block, and coils. Thirteen were elective procedures for large or symptomatic angiomyolipoma and 10 were acute procedures for patients presenting with retroperitoneal haemorrhage. Patients presenting acutely with haemorrhage tended to have extensive multifocal renal involvement. Active bleeding on diagnostic angiography was seen in a single patient who presented with retroperitoneal haemorrhage 48h after elective embolization with PVA alone. Seven out of 10 (70%) of the acute cases displayed splaying of adjacent vessels due to peri-aneurysmal haematoma, known locally as the “light bulb sign”. This allowed treatment to be focused on the symptomatic aneurysm. The light bulb sign was not present in any patient undergoing elective embolization. Aneurysm rupture with active extravasation occurred following embolization of the distal tumour circulation with PVA in four of 10 (40%) of the patients in the acute group and three of 13 (23%) patients in the elective group. Five patients required a subsequent embolization, three at a different site. Two patients in the elective group required repeat embolization of the target site, one for delayed haemorrhage and the other whose tumour did not shrink following the initial incomplete treatment.

Conclusions

Embolization of renal angiomyolipoma produces durable results. The presence of the light bulb sign is a strong indicator of the site of haemorrhage within the kidney. We advocate using a combination of particulate material and coils, as embolization with PVA alone may predispose to acute haemorrhage occurring during or after embolization.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(08)00091-3

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.02.005

Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 8 , Pages 864-870, August 2008