Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 7 , Pages 765-773, July 2008

Impact of the introduction of integrated PET-CT into the preoperative staging pathway of patients with potentially operable oesophageal carcinoma

Department of Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary, St George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

Received 17 September 2007; received in revised form 30 January 2008; accepted 6 February 2008.

Aim

To retrospectively evaluate the role of integrated positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) in oesophageal carcinoma staging, in predicting prognosis and its influence on surgical management.

Materials and methods

Twenty-five consecutive patients with potentially operable, biopsy-proven oesophageal malignancy who undergoing PET-CT from September 2004 to April 2007 were included in this study. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the accuracy of N staging with PET-CT and CT/endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) using postoperative loco-regional nodal histology as the reference standard. The prognostic value of primary tumour maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was derived using logistic regression.

Results

Seventeen men and eight women with a mean age of 62 years were studied. All tumours showed abnormal 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) uptake. Fifteen patients underwent surgical resection. There was high concordance between N staging at CT/EUS (14/15) and final histology. PET-CT N staging was discordant with final nodal histology in over half of the patients (8/15). PET-CT detected occult metastases in three patients (12%) that were not identified on CT and new synchronous tumours in two patients (8%). Patient management was altered in 10 patients (40%) as a direct result of PET-CT. No statistically significant association was observed between SUVmax and clinical outcome (p=0.65).

Conclusion

Integrated PET-CT has a significant incremental value over conventional staging investigations mainly in the detection of distant metastases and synchronous tumours and frequently impacts on patient management.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(08)00083-4

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.02.002

Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 7 , Pages 765-773, July 2008