« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 7
, Pages 796-804
, July 2008
Picture archiving and communication systems lead to sustained improvements in reporting times and productivity: results of a 5-year audit
References
- . Two national audits of radiographic reporting services. Available from: <www.rcr.ac.uk>2000;
- . Work flow redesign: the key to success when using PACS. 2002 J Digit Imaging. 2003;16:164–168
- . Some cost–benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:1089–1098
- Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:1153–1159
- Significant savings in radiologic report turnaround time after implementation of a complete picture archiving and communication system (PACS). J Digit Imaging. 2000;13:175–177
- Impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity. J Digit Imaging. 2006;19:92–97
- Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times. J Digit Imaging. 1999;12:155–159
- Do picture archiving and communication systems improve report turnaround times?. J Digit Imaging. 2000;13:105–107
- . Radiologists' reading times using PACS and using films: one practice's experience. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:453–460
- . Installation of a PACS system. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:480–482
- Inpatient radiology utilization: trends over the past decade. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:7–11
- . The pros and cons of implementing PACS and speech recognition systems. J Digit Imaging. 2001;14:149–157
PII: S0009-9260(08)00040-8
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.12.015
© 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 7
, Pages 796-804
, July 2008
