Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 5 , Pages 543-548, May 2008

Fluoroscopic insertion of post-pyloric feeding tubes: success rates and complications

  • P.D. Thurley
  • ,
  • M.A. Hopper
  • ,
  • J.C. Jobling

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: J.C. Jobling, Department of Clinical Radiology, Nottingham City Hospital Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK. Tel.: +44 0115 969 1169x55803; fax: +44 0115 962 7776.
  • ,
  • K. Teahon

Department of Clinical Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

Received 16 May 2007; received in revised form 30 October 2007; accepted 2 November 2007.

Aim

To examine the success and complication rates of radiological placement of post-pyloric feeding tubes, including those inserted with the assistance of a guide-wire.

Materials and Methods

Two hundred referrals (156 patients), between the dates of 5 April 2002 and 10 September 2004, were identified retrospectively from computerized records. Subsequently, the radiology reports and patients' notes were reviewed to evaluate the indications for post-pyloric feeding, success of placement, use of a guide-wire, and any complications.

Results

A post-pyloric tube was placed in the distal duodenum/jejunum in 183 (91.5%) patients and in the proximal duodenum or distal stomach in six (3%). A tube could not be inserted in 11 (5.5%) patients, and 51 (25.5%) of the insertions required the use of a guide-wire. Immediate complications were recorded in seven patients (3.5%): vomiting (n=5); hypotension and apnoea requiring naloxone (n=1) and hypoxia requiring endotracheal intubation (n=1).

Conclusion

Radiological placement of post-pyloric feeding tubes has a success rate comparable with endoscopically placed tubes, and it rarely involves significant technique-related complications.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(07)00477-1

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2007.11.005

Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 5 , Pages 543-548, May 2008