Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 2 , Pages 125-135, February 2008

Response assessment in lymphoma

  • F.A. Hampson
  • ,
  • A.S. Shaw

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: A.S. Shaw, Box 218, Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. Tel.: +44 1223 216516; fax: +44 1223 217847.

Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

Received 19 July 2007; received in revised form 11 October 2007; accepted 17 October 2007.

The lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant diseases. They are divided into two broad groups: Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients suffering from HD and NHL can be cured by appropriate chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Accurate staging and response assessment is essential to guide management decisions. The International Workshop Group (IWG) criteria, published in 1999, have become the widely accepted standard for response assessment in NHL. Although the IWG criteria have proved extremely useful in the standardization of treatment response, they do have a number of limitations. As a consequence of this, together with advances in functional imaging, revised criteria have been published recently. The aim of this review is to describe the evidence supporting the available imaging techniques, the limitations of each technique, and how these should be applied in clinical practice. We briefly review the corresponding response criteria for central nervous system (CNS) lymphomas, and take a look at novel imaging techniques that may play a role in the future.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(07)00441-2

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2007.10.005

Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 2 , Pages 125-135, February 2008