Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 3 , Pages 252-255, March 2008

Quantitative measurement of intervertebral disc signal using MRI

  • R. Niemeläinen

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: R. Niemeläinen, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 3-48 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G4. Tel.: +1 780 492 1610; fax: +1 780 492 1626.
  • ,
  • T. Videman

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  • ,
  • S.S. Dhillon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  • ,
  • M.C. Battié

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Received 22 May 2007; received in revised form 3 August 2007; accepted 22 August 2007.

Aim

To investigate the spinal cord as an alternative intra-body reference to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in evaluating thoracic disc signal intensity.

Materials and methods

T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of T6–T12 were obtained using 1.5T machines for a population-based sample of 523 men aged 35–70 years. Quantitative data on the signal intensities were acquired using an image analysis program (SpEx©). A random sample of 30 subjects and intraclass correlation coeffcients (ICC) were used to examine the repeatability of the spinal cord measurements. The validity of using the spinal cord as a reference was examined by correlating cord and CSF samples. Finally, thoracic disc signal was validated by correlating it with age without adjustment and adjusting for either cord or CSF. Pearson's r was used for correlational analyses.

Results

The repeatability of the spinal cord signal measurements was extremely high (≥0.99). The correlations between the signals of spinal cord and CSF by level were all above 0.9. The spinal cord-adjusted disc signal and age correlated similarly with CSF-adjusted disc signal and age (r=−0.30 to −0.40 versus r=−0.26 to −0.36).

Conclusion

Adjacent spinal cord is a good alternative reference to the current reference standard, CSF, for quantitative measurements of disc signal intensity. Clearly fewer levels were excluded when using spinal cord as compared to CSF due to missing reference samples.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(07)00410-2

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2007.08.012

Clinical Radiology
Volume 63, Issue 3 , Pages 252-255, March 2008