Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 12 , Pages 1202-1205 , December 2007

Day-case peripheral angioplasty using nurse-led admission, discharge, and follow-up procedures: arterial closure devices are not necessary

Received 16 February 2007 ,Revised 26 April 2007 ,Accepted 1 May 2007.

References 

  1. Gaines PA, Moss JG, Kinsman R, et al. British Society of Interventional Radiology. Second Iliac angioplasty study report 2005. Henley-on-Thames: Dendrite Clinical Systems; 2006;
  2. Wilde NT, Bungay P, Johnson L, et al. Outpatient angioplasty and stenting facilitated by percutaneous arterial suture closure devices. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:1035–1040
  3. Butterfield JS, Fitzgerald JB, Razzaq R, et al. Early mobilization following angioplasty. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:874–877
  4. Ratnam LA, Raja J, Munneke GJ, et al. Prospective non-randomized trial of manual compression and Angio-Seal and Starclose arterial closure devices in common femoral punctures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:182–188
  5. Allen C, Glasziou P, Del-Mar C. Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation. Lancet. 1999;354:1229–1233
  6. Upponi SS, Ganeshan AG, Warakaulle DR, et al. Angioseal versus manual compression for haemostasis following peripheral vasacular diagnostic and interventional procedures — a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61:332–334
  7. Stames BW, O'Donnell SD, Gillespie DL, et al. Percutaneous arterial closure in peripheral vascular disease: a prospective randomized evaluation of the Perclose device. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:263–271
  8. Wagner SC, Gonsalves CF, Eschelman DJ, et al. Complications of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case–control study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:735–741
  9. Boston US, Panneton JM, Hofer JM, et al. Infectious and ischaemic complications from percutaneous closure devices used after vascular access. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17:66–71
  10. Koreny M, Riedműller E, Nikfardjam M, et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;291:350–357
  11. Nikolsky E, Mahran R, Halkin A, et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1200–1209
  12. The Board of the Faculty of Clinical Radiology. The Royal College of Radiologists; The Royal College of Nursing. Guidelines for nursing care in interventional radiology. [Date accessed: November 2006]. http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/GuidelinesforNursing.pdf
  13. The Board of Faculty of Clinical Radiology . Standards for patient consent particular to radiology. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2005;http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/CRpatientconsentweb.pdf[accessed 20.08.07]

PII: S0009-9260(07)00283-8

doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.016

Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 12 , Pages 1202-1205 , December 2007

Article Tools