Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 11 , Pages 1094-1100, November 2007

CT-guided sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures

  • J. Heron

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham
  • ,
  • D.A. Connell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, RNOH Stanmore, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK
  • ,
  • S.L.J. James

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: S.L.J. James, Department of Radiology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK. Tel.: +44 121 685 4135; fax: +44 121 685 4134.

Received 8 March 2007; received in revised form 4 April 2007; accepted 11 April 2007.

Aim

To describe the clinical presentation, procedure and outcome in patients treated with computed tomography (CT)-guided sacroplasty as a treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures.

Materials and Methods

Three patients (mean age 80 years, range 75–87 years) were treated with CT-guided sacroplasty. The mean pre-procedure visual analogue score (VAS) for pain was 8 (range 7–9) with a mean symptom duration of 8 months (range 2.5–18). The procedure was performed under CT guidance with needles being placed along the fracture lines from a posterior approach. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement was introduced in 0.2ml aliquots after cement temperature reduction. Cement injection was monitored by four-secton block axial acquisition to assess potential cement migration.

Results

All three procedures were performed without significant complication. One patient developed a tiny asymptomatic cement leak into the S1 foramen. The mean volume of cement injected into a unilateral sacral fracture was 4ml. All patients tolerated the procedure well under intravenous sedation. The mean VAS score post-procedure was 2. Continued symptomatic relief was seen at 6 weeks and 3 months.

Conclusion

CT-guided sacroplasty represents an alternative treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures that are resistant to conservative treatment. The symptomatic relief the procedure produces seems to be excellent both in this small series and in described cases in the literature.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(07)00237-1

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2007.04.017

Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 11 , Pages 1094-1100, November 2007