MammoGrid — a prototype distributed mammographic database for Europe

References 

1. Highnam R, Brady M. Mammographic image analysis. 1st ed.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999;
2. Estrella F, McClatchey R, Rogulin D, et al. A service- based approach for managing mammography data. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107:235–239
3. Amendolia SR, Brady M, McClatchey R, et al. MammoGrid: large-scale distributed mammogram analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:194–199
   • MEDLINE
4. Boyd NF, Rommens JM, Vogt K, et al. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:798–808
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (504 KB)
   • CrossRef
5. Warner E, Lockwood G, Tritchler D, et al. The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. Cancer Detect Prev. 1992;16:67–72
   • MEDLINE
6. Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Lockwood GA, et al. Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer. 1997;80:66–74
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
7. Bazzocchi M, Facecchia I, Zuiani C, et al. Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications. Radiol Med (Torino). 2001;101:334–340
8. Bottigli U, Delogu P, Fantacci ME, et al. Search of Microcalcification clusters with the CALMA CAD station. Int Soc Opt Eng (SPIE). 2002;4684:1301–1310
9. Pawluczyk O, Augustine B, Yaffe M, et al. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys. 2003;30:352–364
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
10. Robert Jones , et al. The Information Societies Technology Project. In: EU-EGEE, EU Contract IST-2003–508833. 2003;http://www.eu-egee.org/Page accessed 22nd [May 2007]
11. Meta-Data Objects as the Basis for System Evolution F. Estrella, Z. Kovacs, J-M. Le Goff & R. McClatchey. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; vol. 2118, pp. 390–399 ISBN: 3-540-42298-6 Springer-Verlag, 2001 (Presented at the 2nd ACM SIGMOD Int Conf on Web-Age Information Management (WAIM’2001). Xi’an, China. July 2001.
12. Estrella F, Hauer T, McClatchey R, et al. A grid information infrastructure for medical image analysis. In:  Gibaud BDM editors. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Distributed Databases and Processing in Medical Image Computing; 2004; Rennes, France. 2004;
13. Amendolia SR, Estrella F, Del Frate C, et al. Deployment of a grid-based medical imaging application. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;112:59–69
    • MEDLINE
14. Marias K, Behrenbruch C, Highnam R, et al. A mammographic image analysis method to detect and measure changes in breast density. Eur J Radiol. 2004;52:276–282
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (210 KB)
    • CrossRef
15. Berks M, Diffey J, Hufton A, et al. “Feasabiliaty and acceptability of stepwedge based measurement”. In:  Astley S editors. International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2006;p. 355–361
16. Jeffreys M, Warren R, Highnam R, et al. Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form. Br J Radiol. 2006;79:378–382
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
17. Highnam R, Pan X, Warren R, et al. Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF). Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:2693–2713
18. Evertsz CJG, Bodicker A, Bohnenkamp S, et al. Soft-copy reading environment for screening mammography-Screen. In:  Yaffe MJ editors. Digital Mammography. The 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, IWDM 2000, Toronto, Canada. Madison WI, USA: Medical Physics Publishing; 2000;p. 566–572
19. Bui AA, Taira RK, Dionisio JD, et al. Evidence-based radiology: requirements for electronic access. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:662–669
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (398 KB)
    • CrossRef
20. Odeh M, Hauer T, McClatchey R, et al. Use-case driven approach in requirements engineering: the MammoGrid Project. In:  Hamza MH editors. Proceedings of the 7th IASTED Int. Conference on Software Engineering & Applications; 2003; Marina del Rey, CA. ACTA Press; 2003;p. 562–567ACTA Press Calgary, Canada
21. The DICOM standard. In: Digital imaging and communications in medicine. p. http://medical.nema.org/. ACCESSED May 2005, authors National Electrical Manufactures Association.
22. Warren R, Thompson D, del Frate C, et al. A comparison of some anthropometric parameters between an Italian and a UK population: “proof of principle” of a European project using MammoGrid. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:1052–1060
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (307 KB)
    • CrossRef
23. Amendolia SR, Estrella F, del Frate C, et al. Deployment of Grid-based medical imaging application. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;112:59–69
    • MEDLINE
24. Nørager S, Paindaveine YT. The HealthGrid terms of reference. Brussels: EU; 2002;
25. Brady M, Gavaghan M, Simpson A, et al. eDiamond: a grid-enabled federated database of annotated mammograms. In:  Berman F editors. Grid computing: making the global infrastructure a reality. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2003;p. 923–943
26. Brady M, Gilbert F, Lloyd S, et al. eDiamond: the UK's digital mammography national database. In:  Pisano E editors. International Workshop on Digital Mammography. NC, USA: Chapel Hill; 2004;
27. The National Digital Mammography Archive. http://www.ndma.us/pdf/NDMA_brochure_2006.pdf (accessed on 23rd May 2007).
28. From Grid to HealthGrid Editors: T Solomonides, R McClatchey, V Breton, Y Legre & S Norager. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics vol. 112, ISBN: 1-58603-510-X, ISSN: 0926-9630 IOS Press. (Proceedings the 3rd HealthGrid International Conference (HG’05). Oxford, UK. April 2005).