Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 333-339 , April 2007

Imaging findings after minimally invasive nephron-sparing renal therapies

  • N.I. Sarwani

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, USA
    • Departments of Radiology
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: N. Sarwani, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Section of Abdominal Imaging, H066, 500 University Drive, PO Box 850 Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA. Tel.: +1 717 531 8044; fax: +1 717 531 5596.
    • ,
  • G.A. Motta Ramirez

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Radiology
    • ,
  • E.M. Remer

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Radiology
    • ,
  • J.H. Kaouk

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA
    • ,
  • I.S. Gill

      Affiliations

    • Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA

Received 19 March 2006 ,Revised 25 July 2006 ,Accepted 2 August 2006.

References 

  1. Novick AC, Derweesh I. Open partial nephrectomy for renal tumours: current status. BJU Int. 2005;95(Suppl. 2):35–40
  2. Corman JM, Penson DF, Hur K, et al. Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program. BJU Int. 2000;86:782–789
  3. Cadeddu JA, Ono Y, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer evaluation of efficacy and safety: a multicenter experience. Urology. 1998;52:773–777
  4. Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2002;167:1257–1262
  5. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol. 2002;167:469–476
  6. Abreu SC, Gill IS. Renal cell carcinoma: modern surgical approach. Curr Opin Urol. 2003;13:439–444
  7. Ogan K, Cadeddu JA. Minimally invasive management of the small renal tumor: review of laparascopic partial nephrectomiy and ablative techniques. J Endourol. 2002;16(9):635–643
  8. Ramani AP, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, et al. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases. J Urol. 2005;173:42–47
  9. Johnson DB, Solomon SB, Su L, et al. Defining the complications of cryoablation and radiorequency ablation of small renal tumors: a multi-institutional review. J Urol. 2004;172:874–877
  10. Young ST, Paulson EK, McCann RL, et al. Appearance of oxidized cellulose (Surgicel) on postoperative CT scans: similarity to postoperative abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:275–277
  11. Simon SD, Castle EP, Ferrigni RG, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Urol. 2004;171:1447–1450
  12. Lang EK, Thomas R, Davis R, et al. Multiphasic helical CT criteria for differentiation of recurrent neoplasm and desmoplastic reaction after laparoscopic resection of renal mass lesions. J Endourol. 2004;18:167–171
  13. Remer EM, Weinberg EJ, Oto A, et al. MR imaging of the kidneys after laparoscopic cryoablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:635–640
  14. Herts BR, Remer EM, Veniero JV. Digital imaging for nephron-sparing surgery. In:  Morcos SK,  Cohan RH editor. New techniques in uroradiology. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2006;p. 101–131

PII: S0009-9260(07)00003-7

doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.08.019

Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 333-339 , April 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution