Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 358-364, April 2007

Inferior mesenteric veno-caval shunt: imaging features and interventional treatment

  • S. Matsumoto

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: S. Matsumoto, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hasama-machi, Yufu-shi, Oita 879-5593, Japan. Tel.: +81 97 586 5934; fax: +81 97 586 0025.
  • ,
  • H. Mori
  • ,
  • Y. Sagara
  • ,
  • H. Kiyosue
  • ,
  • S. Tanoue

Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Oita, Japan

Received 15 May 2006; received in revised form 26 October 2006; accepted 1 November 2006.

Aim

To describe the imaging features of inferior mesenteric vein (IMV)–inferior vena cava (IVC) shunts, and to describe a treatment strategy for portosystemic encephalopathy, which can be caused by them.

Materials and methods

Between 2000 and 2004, we treated seven patients who had symptomatic IMV–IVC shunts. The results of imaging investigations, which included contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), angiography, and CT during arterial portography, were reviewed retrospectively. We also present our results in the four patients who were treated by retrograde transcaval obliteration (RTCO).

Results

The IMV–IVC shunts had a tortuous or cirsoid appearance ranging in size from 7.2–14.6mm. The shunts were located at a level near to the first branch of the inferior mesenteric artery. The four patients were successfully treated by RTCO and their clinical symptoms improved.

Conclusion

IMV–IVC shunts show a tortuous or cirsoid appearance, connecting at or near the first branch of the inferior mesenteric artery. For symptomatic IMV–IVC shunts, RTCO is recommended as the first choice treatment.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(06)00422-3

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2006.11.014

Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 358-364, April 2007