Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 365-369, April 2007

Is colour Doppler sonography a good method to differentiate normal and abnormal appendices in children?

  • M. Baldisserotto

      Affiliations

    • Hospital da Criança Conceição – Ministério da Saúde, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
    • Hospital São Lucas da Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • ,
  • A.B. Peletti

      Affiliations

    • Hospital da Criança Conceição – Ministério da Saúde, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
    • Hospital São Lucas da Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: A.B. Peletti, Hospital da Criança Conceição, Radiologia, Rua Domingos Rubbo 348 apto 301, 91040-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Tel.: +55 51 3362 5203; fax: +55 51 3334 8974.

Received 16 September 2006; received in revised form 28 October 2006; accepted 9 November 2006.

Aim

To determine whether colour Doppler sonograms can be used to differentiate between the normal appendix and acute appendicitis.

Material and methods

This prospective study examined 50 consecutive children with suspected appendicitis using grey-scale and colour Doppler US. Appendicitis was diagnosed when the appendix diameter was greater than 6mm. Blood flow on the appendiceal wall was measured and classified as non-existent (0 pixels), low (1–2), moderate (3–4) or abundant (>4). Likelihood ratios were calculated for each of these levels. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed by pathological findings, and ruled out by clinical follow-up or pathological findings.

Results

Of the 50 patients examined, 24 had appendicitis and 26 had a normal appendix. For 25 of the patients with a normal appendix, appendicitis was ruled out by clinical follow-up, and for one patient, by pathological findings. The abnormal appendix was identified in all patients with appendicitis. In the group of 26 patients without appendicitis, the normal appendix was visualized in 23 cases, one of which was false positive (100% sensitivity, 96% specificity). Abnormal appendices showed moderate to abundant flow in 62% of the cases and non-existent or low flow in 38%. Normal appendices had non-existent or low flow in 82% of the cases, but moderate or abundant in 18%. Significant differences were only found when the number of pixels was >4.

Conclusion

Although the vascularity of normal and inflamed appendices may be different, this difference was not a good diagnostic indicator of appendicitis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(06)00417-X

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2006.11.009

Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 4 , Pages 365-369, April 2007