Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 3 , Pages 252-261 , March 2007

Role of ultrasonography and MRI in the detection of wide intraductal component of invasive breast cancer—a prospective study

  • S. Sundararajan

      Affiliations

    • Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, Advances in Biomedical Applications, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: S. Sundararajan, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, Advances in Biomedical Applications, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, 305-8575, Japan. Tel./fax: +81 29853 3205.
    • ,
  • E. Tohno

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
    • ,
  • H. Kamma

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Kyorin University, School of Medicine, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
    • ,
  • E. Ueno

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
    • ,
  • M. Minami

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-shi, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan

Received 27 September 2005 ,Revised 3 September 2006 ,Accepted 7 September 2006.

References 

  1. Stewart BW, Kleihues P. World cancer report. World Health Organization; 2003;
  2. Holland R, Connlly JL, Mravunac M, et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:113
  3. Lindley R, Bulman A, Parsons P, et al. Histologic features predictive of an increased risk of early local recurrence of treatment of breast cancer by local tumour excision and radical radiotherapy. Surgery. 1989;105:13
  4. Fatouros M, Roukos DH, Arampatzis I, et al. Factors increasing local recurrence in breast-conserving surgery. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2005;5:737
  5. Noh WC, Paik NS, Kim MS, et al. Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after breast-conserving therapy: a comparison of quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy at a single institution. World J Surg. 2005;29:1001
  6. Sundararajan S, Tohno E, Ueno E, et al. Detection of intraductal component of invasive breast cancer by US: comparison with MRI and histopathology. Radiat Med. 2006;24:108
  7. Anon . General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer. 15th ed. Tokyo: The Japanese Breast Cancer Society; 2002;
  8. Pomp J, Blom J, Zwinderman AH, et al. Analysis of local recurrence after breast conservative treatment for invasive breast cancer: a single institution cohort. Oncol Rep. 2005;14:1255
  9. Tsunoda HS, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Echogram of ductal spreading of breast carcinoma [In Japanese]. Jpn J Med Ultrasonics. 1990;17:44
  10. Satake H, Shimamoto K, Sawaki A, et al. Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1726
  11. Han BK, Choe YH, Ko YH, et al. Benign papillary lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18:217
  12. Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:190
  13. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guienebretiere JM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging–histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1995;196:415
  14. Ando Y, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, et al. Intramammary extension of breast cancer: diagnosis with MR mammography. Breast Cancer. 1998;5:291
  15. Hiramatsu H, Enomoto K, Ikeda T, et al. The role of contrast enhanced high resolution MRI in the surgical planning of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 1997;4:285
  16. Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Dijckmans L, et al. MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:809
  17. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium–enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology. 1995;197:387
  18. Boetes C, Mus RDM, Holland R, et al. Breast tumours comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197:743
  19. Gilles R, Guinebretiere J, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpapable breast tumours: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;191:625

PII: S0009-9260(06)00295-9

doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.09.004

Clinical Radiology
Volume 62, Issue 3 , Pages 252-261 , March 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution