Clinical Radiology
Volume 61, Issue 12 , Pages 1055-1057, December 2006

Topical ethyl chloride fine spray. Does it have any antimicrobial activity?

  • K. Burney

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Clinical Radiology
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondent: K. Burney, 17 Bracken Hall, Bracken Place, Chilworth, Southampton, SO16 3ET, UK. Tel.: +44 7966169255; fax: +44 2380760559.
  • ,
  • K. Bowker

      Affiliations

    • Medical Microbiology, Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK
  • ,
  • R. Reynolds

      Affiliations

    • Medical Microbiology, Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK
  • ,
  • M. Bradley

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Clinical Radiology
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor: M. Bradley.

Received 3 May 2006; received in revised form 21 June 2006; accepted 9 July 2006.

Aim

The aim of this study was to assess whether ethyl chloride fine spray (Cryogesic®) has antimicrobial activity.

Material and methods

Blood agar plates supplemented with 5% horse blood were inoculated with five different organisms, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Streptococcus pyogenes and Enterococcus faecalis. The plates were assessed for growth inhibition at 24 and 48h by the microbiologist and compared with the non-sprayed control plates.

Results

The model showed a highly significant (p<0.0001) reduction in bacterial count for the plates treated with fine ethyl chloride spray. The estimate of the percentage of bacteria remaining after spraying with ethyl chloride was 42.7%, with a 95% confidence interval of 35.9–50.9%. There was no evidence that the effect of ethyl chloride fine spray was different for the different organisms (p=0.49).

Conclusion

The use of ethyl chloride shows bacterial count reduction but the clinical implication of this needs to be determined. The authors postulate that any statistically significant reduction can only be helpful in reducing the infection rates. This coupled with the already proven local anaesthetic effects of ethyl chloride will make it an important tool for procedures like arthrocentesis and venepunctures.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(06)00249-2

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2006.07.009

Clinical Radiology
Volume 61, Issue 12 , Pages 1055-1057, December 2006