Clinical Radiology
Volume 61, Issue 12 , Pages 1035-1040, December 2006

Outpatient angioplasty and stenting facilitated by percutaneous arterial suture closure devices

South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK

Received 6 March 2006; received in revised form 29 June 2006; accepted 9 July 2006.

Aim

To review our practice of outpatient percutaneous vascular interventions facilitated by an arterial suture device.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of all patients attending this tertiary centre for iliac or femoral intervention was undertaken between February 2001 and December 2004. All patients who underwent angioplasty or stenting had their puncture sites closed using a Perclose suture. Patients were kept flat for 15min and allowed to fully mobilize at 60min. Puncture sites were scored for visible bruising, haematoma and pain at discharge and on outpatient follow-up. Patient preference for future outpatient treatment was assessed.

Results

Fifty-seven outpatients underwent 81 punctures. Forty-eight (84%) patients underwent iliac angioplasty; of those 42% underwent stent placement. Six patients (10%) required inpatient admission, five secondary to failed suture deployment. One patient had a non-closer-related puncture site intimal flap occlusion successfully repaired at surgery. Fifty-one (90%) patients discharged with a mean time of 157min (60–280min). Forty-six (92%) patients had no visible bruising or palpable haematoma on discharge. No patient had a haematoma greater than 2.5cm. No discharged patient required readmission. Thirty percent reported a moderate to severe groin pain score (2–5/5) at discharge, increasing to 40% at follow-up. Forty-seven (98%) of the 48 patients, who expressed a preference, would be happy to undergo outpatient treatment again.

Conclusion

Outpatient treatment is feasible, well tolerated and preferable to patients, but 10% will require inpatient admission. A planned post-procedure analgesia regimen or advice should be considered.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(06)00247-9

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2006.07.008

Clinical Radiology
Volume 61, Issue 12 , Pages 1035-1040, December 2006