Clinical Radiology
Volume 61, Issue 8 , Pages 696-699, August 2006

Popliteal artery branching patterns—an angiographic study

  • C.P. Day

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: C.P. Day, Department of Radiology, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Mytton Oak Road, Shrewsbury SY3 8XQ, UK. Tel.: +44 1785811486; Mob.: 07917 300631.
  • ,
  • R. Orme

Department of Radiology, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK

Received 16 February 2006; received in revised form 8 March 2006; accepted 28 March 2006.

AIM

To analyse the variations in branching patterns of the popliteal artery and infrapopliteal vessels using angiography.

MATERIALS And METHODS

Femoral angiograms of 1037 lower limbs in 568 patients were examined to assess the popliteal artery branching pattern. Variations of the infrapopliteal vessels supplying the foot were assessed in 662 limbs from the same cohort of patients.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and forty-one (90.7%) limbs had the usual branching pattern with anterior tibial artery (AT) arising first followed by the tibial–peroneal trunk (TPT), which then gives rise to the posterior tibial (PT) and peroneal (PR) arteries. Variations in popliteal branching pattern were seen in 96 (9.3%) limbs. The commonest variation is high origin of the AT in 47 (4.5%) limbs or trifurcation of the popliteal artery in 33 (3.2%) limbs with AT, PT and PR arising together with no true TPT. The course of AT with high origin either anterior or posterior to popliteus was almost equal [25 (2.4%) or 22 (2.1%) limbs, respectively]. Eleven limbs (1.1%) had high origin of PT and two (0.2%) had a high origin of the PR. Six hundred and fifty-five (99%) limbs had normal infrapopliteal vessels. Seven (1%) had hypoplasia–aplasia of the infrapopliteal vessels. Five (0.8%) limbs had a hypoplastic PT with the remaining 2 (0.2%) having either a hypoplastic–aplastic AT or hypoplasia–aplasia of both AT and PT.

CONCLUSION

Variations in the branching of the popliteal artery occur in about 10% of patients. Knowledge of these variations is important because of the potential consequences for the management of peripheral vascular disease.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(06)00105-X

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2006.03.014

Clinical Radiology
Volume 61, Issue 8 , Pages 696-699, August 2006