Clinical Radiology
Volume 61, Issue 8 , Pages 686-690, August 2006

Does the insertion of more than one wire allow successful excision of large clusters of malignant calcification?

  • C.M. Cordiner

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Radiology
    • Corresponding Author InformationGuarantor and correspondent: C.M. Cordiner, The West of Scotland Breast Screening Service, 77 Stock Exchange Court, Nelson Mandela Place, Glasgow G2 1QT, UK. Tel.: +44 141 572 5829; fax: +44 141 572 5801.
  • ,
  • J.C. Litherland

      Affiliations

    • The West of Scotland Breast Screening Service, Glasgow, UK
  • ,
  • I.E. Young

      Affiliations

    • Surgery, Western Infirmary

Received 16 August 2005; received in revised form 7 February 2006; accepted 28 February 2006.

AIM

To determine whether the insertion of more than one localization wire for larger areas of malignant microcalcification reduces the need for re-excision.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study of 101 cases of malignant calcifications preoperatively marked by one or more wires. Surgical and histopathology data were obtained from hospital records. Mammograms and specimen radiographs were evaluated without knowledge of the eventual outcome, i.e., whether further surgery was required or not. All cases had a preoperative diagnosis of malignancy.

RESULT

In this study the group of patients in which two or more wires were inserted had mammographically larger lesions (p<0.000001) but did not have a greater chance of needing re-excision (p=0.822). Mammograms that demonstrated flecks of microcalcification outlying the main cluster were also more likely to require further surgery (p<0.01). Calcifications associated with high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) had three times the risk of requiring further surgery (p<0.01). However, as reported in other studies re-excision was not related to breast size (p=0.63) [Kollias J, Gill PG, Beamond B, Rossi H, Langlois S, Vernon-Roberts E. Clinical and radiological predictors of complete excision in breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 1998;68:702–6].

CONCLUSION

It was previously suggested that the risk of re-excision for DCIS is related to the size of the initial lesion [Cheng L, Al-Kaisi NK, Gordon NH, Liu AY, Gebrail F, Shenk RR. Relationship between the size and margins of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and residual disease. J Nat Cancer Inst 1997;89:1356–60]. However, in the present study larger clusters of microcalcification that have been ‘bracketed’ by two or more wires do not appear to have a greater requirement for re-excision. Grading of the malignant microcalcifications preoperatively may encourage the surgeon to take a wider margin. Careful examination of the mammograms at localization to include outlying flecks could help to reduce the need for further surgery.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0009-9260(06)00097-3

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2006.02.009

Clinical Radiology
Volume 61, Issue 8 , Pages 686-690, August 2006